Comparison of the effects of face-to-face and virtual education on the care burden of attendants of patients with Multiple Sclerosis

Salehi Tizabi , Farzaneh; Bakhshi, Mahmoud; Zare, Masoud

Volume 13, Issue 3 (9-2025) jmsthums 2025, 13(3): 12-25 | Back to browse issues page

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Salehi Tizabi F, Bakhshi M, Zare M. Comparison of the effects of face-to-face and virtual education on the care burden of attendants of patients with Multiple Sclerosis. jmsthums 2025; 13 (3) :12-25
URL: http://jms.thums.ac.ir/article-1-1424-en.html

Comparison of the effects of face-to-face and virtual education on the care burden of attendants of patients with Multiple Sclerosis

Farzaneh Salehi Tizabi¹

, Mahmoud Bakhshi²

, Masoud Zare³

1- Student Research Committee, faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
2- Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran & Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, school of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
3- Department of community health nursing, school of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract: (28 Views)

Background & Aim: Attendants of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) experience a heavy care burden and need to improve their lifestyle. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of face-to-face and virtual education on the care burden of attendants of patients with MS.
Methods: This randomized two-group clinical trial was conducted on 82 attendants of MS patients who referred to the MS Clinic of Ghaem Hospital in Mashhad in 2024. Participants were randomly assigned to either the face-to-face or virtual education group using simple randomization. In the face-to-face group, healthy lifestyle education was provided in five 45–60-minute sessions over five consecutive weeks. In the virtual group, the same educational content was delivered through the Eita messenger application in five sessions. The care burden was measured before the intervention and one month after the completion of the educational sessions. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26 with independent t-test, paired t-test, and chi-square test.
Results: The mean care burden scores after the intervention were 30.07 ± 8.90 in the face-to-face group and 34.28 ± 11.73 in the virtual group. The independent t-test showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.72). Within-group comparisons revealed a significant decrease in care burden scores in both groups (from 45.82 ± 7.26 and 47.61 ± 8.52 before the intervention to 30.07 ± 8.90 and 34.28 ± 11.73 after the intervention, respectively; P < 0.001).
Conclusion: The results indicated no significant difference between the effectiveness of face-to-face and virtual lifestyle education in reducing the care burden of attendants of MS patients. Health managers can use virtual education as an alternative or complementary method to face-to-face education to promote the lifestyle of MS patient attendants.

Keywords: Healthy lifestyle, Virtual education, Care burden, Attendants, Multiple Sclerosis

Full-Text [PDF 460 kb] (53 Downloads)

Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2025/03/2 | Accepted: 2025/07/28 | Published: 2025/11/17

References

1. Baranzini SE, Oksenberg JR. The genetics of multiple sclerosis: from 0 to 200 in 50 years. Trends in genetics. 2017;33(12):960-70. [DOI:10.1016/j.tig.2017.09.004]

2. Maguire R, Maguire P. Caregiver burden in multiple sclerosis: recent trends and future directions. Current neurology and neuroscience reports. 2020;20:1-9. [DOI:10.1007/s11910-020-01043-5]

3. Khan G, Hashim MJ. Epidemiology of Multiple Sclerosis: Global, Regional, National and Sub-National-Level Estimates and Future Projections. Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health. 2025;15(1):21. [DOI:10.1007/s44197-025-00353-6]

4. Azami M, YektaKooshali MH, Shohani M, Khorshidi A, Mahmudi L. Epidemiology of multiple sclerosis in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one. 2019;14(4):e0214738. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0214738]

5. Nahayati MA, Dashtebayaz AH, Taghipour A, Baghaei M. The epidemiologic trend of multiple sclerosis in Razavi Khorasan Province, Iran in fifteen-year period. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders. 2025;93:106217. [DOI:10.1016/j.msard.2024.106217]

6. Cerqueira ACd, Andrade PS, Godoy-Barreiros JM, Nardi AE. Risk factors for suicide in multiple sclerosis: a case-control study. Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria. 2015;64:303-6. [DOI:10.1590/0047-2085000000093]

7. Sadeghi B, Estebsari F, Ebadi A, Rasouli M, Sadeghi E. The Social Support Needs of Family Caregivers of Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: A Qualitative Study. jrehab. 2022;23(1):68-87. [DOI:10.32598/RJ.23.1.3330.1]

8. Kazemi A, Azimian J, Maf M, Allen K-A, Motalebi SA. Caregiver burden and coping strategies in caregivers of older patients with stroke. BMC Psychol. 2021;9(1):1-9. [DOI:10.1186/s40359-021-00556-z]

9. Meca-Lallana J, Mendibe M, Hernández-Clares R, Caminero AB, Mallada-Frechin J, Dávila-Gonzalez P, et al. Predictors of burden and depression among caregivers of relapsing-remitting MS patients in Spain: MS Feeling study. Neurodegenerative disease management. 2016;6(4):277-87. [DOI:10.2217/nmt-2016-0014]

10. Bayoumi MM. Subjective burden on family carers of hemodialysis patients. Open J Nephrol. 2014;2014:79-85. [DOI:10.4236/ojneph.2014.42011]

11. Neate SL, Taylor KL, Jelinek GA, DeLivera AM, Brown CR, Weiland TJ. Taking active steps: Changes made by partners of people with multiple sclerosis who undertake lifestyle modification. PLoS One. 2019;14(2):e0212422. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0212422]

12. Dennison L, Moss-Morris R, Chalder T. A review of psychological correlates of adjustment in patients with multiple sclerosis. Clinical psychology review. 2009;29(2):141-53. [DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2008.12.001]

13. Santos M, Sousa C, Pereira M, Pereira MG. Quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis: A study with patients and caregivers. Disability and health journal. 2019;12(4):628-34. [DOI:10.1016/j.dhjo.2019.03.007]

14. Ghorbanizad-Shiran H, Abedini S, Rasulzadeh-Aghdam S. Sociological Study of Lifestyle Diseases in Terms of Occurrence, Consequence and Prevention: Study by Integrated Method. Sociological studies. 2020;13(47):19-38.

15. Aghasi ‎ M, Dadkhah A. Correlation between Lifestyle Components with General Health ‎in Family. Islamic lifestyle with a focus on health. 2018;2(2):99-104.

16. Dehghan N, Imani E, Neghi AA, Tashnizi SH. The Relationship between Education Based on Orem's Self-Care Model and Caregiver's Quality of Life: A Quasi-Experimental Study in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. Research in Health & Medical Sciences. 2023;1(5):59-68.

17. Martindale-Adams J, Zuber J, Levin M, Burns R, Graney M, Nichols LO. Integrating caregiver support into multiple sclerosis care. Multiple Sclerosis International. 2020;2020(1):3436726. [DOI:10.1155/2020/3436726]

18. Pahlavanzadeh S, Dalvi-Isfahani F, Alimohammadi N, Chitsaz A. The effect of group psycho-education program on the burden of family caregivers with multiple sclerosis patients in Isfahan in 2013-2014. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research. 2015;20(4):420-5. [DOI:10.4103/1735-9066.161000]

19. Kabotari Z, Abolhassani S, Abazari P. The effect of online home care training on the burden of caregivers for patients with multiple sclerosis. Nursing and Midwifery Studies. 2024;13(4):251-8.

20. Hoseinpour F, Ghahari S, Motaharinezhad F, Binesh M. Supportive interventions for caregivers of individuals with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review. International Journal of MS Care. 2023;25(6):266-72. [DOI:10.7224/1537-2073.2022-083]

21. Banitalebi S, Etemadifar S, Kheiri S, Masoudi R. The effect of a self-management program on care burden and self-efficacy in family caregivers of people with multiple sclerosis. Journal of Nursing Research. 2022;30(5):e234. [DOI:10.1097/jnr.0000000000000509]

22. Rajachandrakumar R, Finlayson M. Multiple sclerosis caregiving: a systematic scoping review to map current state of knowledge. Health & Social Care in the Community. 2022;30(4):e874-e97. [DOI:10.1111/hsc.13687]

23. Homayouni A, Vasli P, Estebsari F, Nasiri M. Reducing care burden and improving adherence to health-promoting behaviors among family caregivers of patients with multiple sclerosis through a healthy lifestyle empowerment program. BMC nursing. 2022;21(1):229. [DOI:10.1186/s12912-022-00961-8]

24. Shams s, Hemmati m, Sheikhi n. Comparison of the effects of face-to-face and video instructional methods on self-esteem of the patients with hemodialysis. Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Urmia University of Medical Sciences. 2015;13(6):544-52.

25. Korda H, Itani Z. Harnessing social media for health promotion and behavior change. Health promotion practice. 2013;14(1):15-23. [DOI:10.1177/1524839911405850]

26. Michie S, Yardley L, West R, Patrick K, Greaves F. Developing and Evaluating Digital Interventions to Promote Behavior Change in Health and Health Care: Recommendations Resulting From an International Workshop. Journal of medical Internet research. 2017;19(6):e232. [DOI:10.2196/jmir.7126]

27. Patel R, Chang T, Greysen SR, Chopra V. Social Media Use in Chronic Disease: A Systematic Review and Novel Taxonomy. The American Journal of Medicine. 2015;128(12):1335-50. [DOI:10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.06.015]

28. Mousaei FM, Mirhosseini S, Mafi MH, Günaydın N, Zendehtalab HR. Effect of support based on family centered empowerment model on care burden in family caregivers of patients with multiple sclerosis. Frontiers in Public Health. 2023;11:1115311. [DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1115311]

29. Caregiver Burnout.Available from:https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/9225-caregiver-burnout.Access date: 2025 June 13.

30. Abbasi A, Asayesh H, Rahmani H, Shariati A, abedin Hosseini S, Rouhi G. The burden on cargivers from hemodialysis patients and related factors. Journal of Research Development in Nursing and Midwifery. 2011;8(1):26-33.

31. Valer DB, Aires M, Fengler FL, Paskulin LMG. Adaptation and validation of the Caregiver Burden Inventory for use with caregivers of elderly individuals. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem. 2015;23(1):130-8. [DOI:10.1590/0104-1169.3357.2534]

32. Haghshenas H, Jokar Z, Zarshenas L, Rakhshan M, Poursadeghfard M. Assessing the psychometric properties of persian version of Zarit Burden interview among family caregivers of patients with multiple sclerosis. BMC nursing. 2023;22(1):97. [DOI:10.1186/s12912-023-01260-6]

33. Asgharzadeh-Morghmalaki H. Healthy lifestyle. Tehran: Azarfar; 2021.

34. Phillips EM, Frates EP, Park DJ. Lifestyle medicine. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2020;31(4):515-26. [DOI:10.1016/j.pmr.2020.07.006]

35. Walker SN, Sechrist KR, Pender NJ. The health-promoting lifestyle profile: development and psychometric characteristics. Nurs Res. 1987;36(2):76-81. [DOI:10.1097/00006199-198703000-00002]

36. https://www.aparat.com.

37. Livingston PM, Osborne RH, Botti M, Mihalopoulos C, McGuigan S, Heckel L, et al. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an outcall program to reduce carer burden and depression among carers of cancer patients [PROTECT]: rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial. BMC health services research. 2014;14:1-8. [DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-14-5]

38. Douglas SL, Plow M, Packer T, Lipson AR, Lehman MJ. Psychoeducational interventions for caregivers of persons with multiple sclerosis: protocol for a randomized trial. JMIR Research Protocols. 2021;10(8):e30617. [DOI:10.2196/30617]

39. Bakhsian NJ, Zahrakar K, Davarniya R. A study on the effectiveness of caregivers' group supportive-training intervention on the mental health of MS patients. Razi Journal of Medical Sciences. 2016;23(144):19-29.

40. Behzadi H, Borimnejad L, Mardani-Hamoleh M, Haghani S. Effect of an Online Educational Intervention on Resilience and Care Burden of the Parents of Children With Cancer. Iran Journal of Nursing. 2022;35(2):118-33. [DOI:10.32598/ijn.35.2.247.4]

41. Bahadori M, Sami R, Abolhassan S, Atashi V. Effect of a Mobile Training Application on Psychological Distress of Family Caregivers of Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Archives of Rehabilitation (Journal of Rehabilitation). 2023;24(2):196-211. [DOI:10.32598/RJ.24.2.3313.2]

42. Blom MM, Zarit SH, Groot Zwaaftink RB, Cuijpers P, Pot AM. Effectiveness of an Internet intervention for family caregivers of people with dementia: results of a randomized controlled trial. PloS one. 2015;10(2):e0116622. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0116622]

43. Nouri M, Jafari Varjoshani N, Ghahremani Z, Ahmadi F. The Effect of Virtual Training on the Care Burden of Caregivers to Patients with Breast Cancer. Preventive Care in Nursing & Midwifery Journal. 2023;13(2):40-9. [DOI:10.61186/pcnm.13.2.40]

44. Bani-Ardalan H, Motalebi S A, Shahrokhi A, Mohammadi F. Effect of Education and Telephone Follow-Up on Care Burden of Caregivers of Older Patients with Stroke. Salmand: Iranian Journal of Ageing. 2022;17(2):290-303. [DOI:10.32598/sija.2022.2183.3]

45. Tsai CF, Hwang WS, Lee JJ, Wang WF, Huang LC, Huang LK, et al. Predictors of caregiver burden in aged caregivers of demented older patients. BMC geriatrics. 2021;21:1-9. [DOI:10.1186/s12877-021-02007-1]

46. Junkins CC, Kent E, Litzelman K, Bevans M, Cannady RS, Rosenberg AR. Cancer across the ages: a narrative review of caregiver burden for patients of all ages. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology. 2020;38(6):782-98. [DOI:10.1080/07347332.2020.1796887]

47. Tramonti F, Bongioanni P, Leotta R, Puppi I, Rossi B. Age, gender, kinship and caregiver burden in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Psychology, health & medicine. 2015;20(1):41-6. [DOI:10.1080/13548506.2014.892627]