Volume 2, Issue 1 (4-2014)                   2014, 2(1): 7-16 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

bastani P, amini M, tahernejad A, rouhollahi N. The Tehran University of Medical Sciences Faculty Members’ Viewpoints about the Teachers’ Evaluation System: A Qualitative Study . Journal title 2014; 2 (1) :7-16
URL: http://jms.thums.ac.ir/article-1-102-en.html
Abstract:   (11886 Views)
Background and aim: According to the different advantages and disadvantages of students` questionnaires as a source of teachers’ evaluation, this qualitative study aimed to find out the faculty members’ viewpoints about the present teachers’ evaluation process in Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Materials and Methods : The present study is a qualitative study based on content analysis which was conducted on 20 faculty members of Tehran University of Medical Sciences chosen purposefully and reached the saturation level. The data were gathered and analyzed in 2013. Data were collected through a topic guide containing 3 main questions with semi structured interviews and were analyzed through applying a five-step content analysis using Atlas ti. Results: Findings showed that there were 4 themes and 17 subthemes which are as follows: clarifying the purpose of teacher evaluation (Correction or punishment), correcting the evaluative methods (development of mixed evaluation method, evaluation sheet correction, and designing of evaluation tools), determining the strengths and weaknesses of each method (students’ questionnaire, managers’ questionnaire, peer review, self-evaluation, and portfolio). Conclusion: It is necessary to clarify the aim of evaluation and emphasize its positive aspects applying a mixed method of students’ questionnaire, managers’ questionnaire, peer review, self evaluation, portfolio, observation of colleagues while teaching, measurement of students’ achievements to achieve a comprehensive evaluating of faculty members.
Full-Text [PDF 223 kb]   (6286 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2014/09/1 | Accepted: 2014/12/20 | Published: 2015/03/8

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb