Background: A number of
studies investigated the effects of maternal position in different stages of
delivery. Some of these studies mentioned the effects of maternal position on
pain and delivery’s outcome. This study aimed to compare effects of two sitting
and supine positions on delivery’s outcome.
Materials and Methods:
In this quasi-experimental study, 56 pregnant women randomly allocated to two
groups. Then both groups were asked to fill Berger Nervousness Measure and
determine their pain using Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Group A began with 30 min
in the sitting position and group B began with 30 min supine position, followed
by 30 min supine sitting position. Therefore maternal position in group A was
sitting- supine- sitting- supine, and in group B was supine- sitting-supine
sitting. Each 30 min period the woman asked to rate the labor pain using visual
Analog scale (VAS). Data was analyzed using Chi-Square, Mann-Whitney, Wilcoxon
and Variance Analysis.
Results: There were no statistically significant differences
between mean pain in sitting and supine position in all women. There were
significant differences in satisfaction with labor experience and time to
start breastfeeding in two groups
(p=0.001).
Conclusion: We conclude that a certain position can not provide less
pain through the first Stage of labor. Therefore is no reason to discourage
patients from adopting the position of their choice in labor. On the other
hand, maternal position has positive impact on Satisfaction, earlier time to
start breastfeeding, need for accelerating labor with oxitocin and
cesarean rate. So it is recommended to
apply most convenient maternal status if there is no medical problem.
Rights and permissions | |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |